简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:FCA charges Daniel Pugh for £1.3M fraud in unauthorized investment scheme.
The British Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has taken decisive action against Daniel Pugh, pressing charges for one count of fraud and three violations of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA).
According to the FCA, Pugh allegedly deceived investors between March 2019 and August 2020, amassing approximately £1.3 million through an unauthorized investment scheme named 'Imperial Investments Fund'.
The allegations against Pugh revolve around a web of misrepresentations he purportedly spun to potential investors, falsely claiming attractive interest rates, profitable trading activity, and impressive scheme profits. Additionally, it is claimed that Pugh engaged in regulated activities in the UK, such as accepting deposits and operating a collective investment scheme, all without proper authorization from the FCA.
Pugh appeared in Westminster Magistrates Court to face the charges, and the case has been subsequently transferred to Southwark Crown Court, where a plea and pretrial hearing are scheduled for 15 August 2023.
The FSMA stipulates that engaging in regulated activities in the UK without FCA authorization is a criminal offence punishable by up to two years in prison, as highlighted in Section 19. Similarly, Section 21 of the FSMA deems it illegal to communicate invitations or inducements to invest without FCA approval, carrying the same maximum sentence of two years imprisonment for violators.
The FCA's unwavering commitment to safeguarding investors is well-known, with the regulatory body frequently alerting the public to potential fraudulent investment firms and imposing substantial financial penalties.
One recent example is the hefty fine of £2,452,700 levied on Bastion Capital London Limited for significant financial control shortcomings related to cum-ex trading. Bastion's inadequate risk management regarding fraudulent trading and money laundering activities triggered the penalty.
Additionally, the FCA has diligently targeted unlawful crypto ATMs across the UK, investigating 34 sites suspected of harbouring these devices in collaboration with other law enforcement agencies. As a result, 26 machines operating outside the bounds of the law were successfully identified and disrupted.
Earlier this year, the FCA also made headlines when it announced that the mastermind behind a $3.6 million boiler room scam would face an additional four-year prison term. Initially sentenced to 11 years in 2018, the individual received this additional penalty due to non-payment of the confiscation order.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Webull Financial, alongside Lightspeed Financial Services Group and Paulson Investment Company, LLC, has agreed to pay a collective fine of $275,000 following an investigation by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The penalty was issued due to the firms’ failure to include essential information in suspicious activity reports (SARs) over a four-year period.
Barclays has reached a settlement with the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), agreeing to pay a £40 million fine for failing to adequately disclose arrangements with Qatari investors during its critical fundraising efforts amidst the 2008 financial crisis.
In the midst of rapid advancements and evolving landscapes in financial technology, financial regulation, and ensuring financial security, WikiGlobal stands at the forefront, closely tracking these transformative trends. As we embark on our series of exclusive interviews focusing on these pivotal areas, we are delighted to have had an in-depth conversation with.
An individual trader has come forward with allegations of an unfavourable experience while using the services of the broker TradeEU.global.