简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has raised concerns over the safety of $2.2 billion in customer assets held by Binance's U.S. subsidiary.
Recently, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed multiple charges against cryptocurrency exchange Binance, its affiliated entities, and CEO Changpeng Zhao, alleging illegal operations and the violation of securities laws. Click this link below for more details.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has raised concerns over the safety of $2.2 billion in customer assets held by Binance's U.S. subsidiary. The regulatory body has filed an emergency motion, claiming that the cryptocurrency exchange and its founder, Changpeng Zhao, maintain effective control over these funds.
The SEC's alarm stems from what they perceive as an insufficient level of assurance regarding the safety of the $2.2 billion in customer assets held by Binance U.S. Despite operating as a separate entity from its parent company, Binance's U.S. subsidiary has come under scrutiny due to perceived control exerted by the primary business and its founder.
To address their concerns, the SEC has taken legal action by filing an emergency motion with a federal court. The motion argues that Binance's main business, in conjunction with Changpeng Zhao, maintains effective control over the billions of dollars of customer funds held by Binance U.S. The regulatory body's aim is to obtain a temporary restraining order to freeze these assets until the situation is clarified and the safety of the funds can be ensured.
The SEC's intervention is driven by the objective of protecting the assets and interests of Binance U.S. clients. By seeking a temporary restraining order, the regulatory body aims to mitigate any potential risks associated with the $2.2 billion in customer assets. This measure would enable the SEC to gain control over the situation and ensure that clients' funds are safeguarded.
As of now, Binance has not issued an official statement in response to the SEC's emergency motion. However, it is worth noting that the cryptocurrency exchange has faced regulatory scrutiny in the past. Binance has made efforts to comply with regulations by establishing a separate U.S. subsidiary to cater specifically to American customers. Nonetheless, the SEC's concerns about the control exerted by Binance's main business raise questions about the efficacy of these measures.
The SEC's recent emergency motion highlights significant concerns surrounding the safety of $2.2 billion in customer assets held by Binance's U.S. subsidiary. While the regulatory body acknowledges the separate legal entity status of Binance U.S., it argues that the primary business and Changpeng Zhao still wield effective control over these funds. With the objective of protecting Binance U.S. clients, the SEC is seeking a temporary restraining order to freeze these assets until the situation is clarified. This move underscores the ongoing need for regulatory oversight in the cryptocurrency industry and the importance of ensuring the security of customer assets.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Webull Financial, alongside Lightspeed Financial Services Group and Paulson Investment Company, LLC, has agreed to pay a collective fine of $275,000 following an investigation by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The penalty was issued due to the firms’ failure to include essential information in suspicious activity reports (SARs) over a four-year period.
In the midst of rapid advancements and evolving landscapes in financial technology, financial regulation, and ensuring financial security, WikiGlobal stands at the forefront, closely tracking these transformative trends. As we embark on our series of exclusive interviews focusing on these pivotal areas, we are delighted to have had an in-depth conversation with.
An individual trader has come forward with allegations of an unfavourable experience while using the services of the broker TradeEU.global.
A 49-year-old e-hailing driver in Malaysia fell victim to a fraudulent investment scheme, losing RM218,000 in a matter of weeks. The scheme, which falsely promised returns of 3 to 5 per cent within just three days, left the individual financially devastated.