简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Unmasking Ivision Market's deceit: from withholding funds to coercive review demands, the shocking tactics demand heightened investor vigilance in the online trading realm.
In the intricate world of online trading, a disconcerting tale emerges, shedding light on the predicament faced by an investor, Saeed, entangled with Ivision Market. This narrative unravels a sequence of events that turned tumultuous for a trader seeking financial growth but found himself in a distressing situation.
Ivision Market, an online trading platform, is now under scrutiny as Saeed recounts his ordeal, accusing the company of holding his funds under the pretext of damaging their reputation.
Saeed initiated his investment journey by depositing AED 6000 into his Ivision Market account on 7th August 2023. The first withdrawal was attempted on 16th September 2023, but to this day, not a single dirham has found its way to Saeed's account. The promise of financial growth quickly turned into an agonizing wait for his hard-earned funds.
In desperate attempts to resolve the issue, Saeed reached out to Ivision Markets alleged Dubai leader, Mr. Nadeem, multiple times. However, these efforts were in vain as Mr. Nadeem chose to block Saeed's number, leaving him without a means to communicate with the company.
Frustrated and left with no recourse, Saeed resorted to expressing his grievances on WikiFX's Exposure page. A negative review, posted at the beginning of December 2023, stands as a testament to Saeed's dissatisfaction. The screenshot below attests to his attempt to bring attention to his predicament.
In a startling turn of events, Ivision Market's customer service promptly reached out to Saeed, not to address the concerns but to demand the removal of the negative review. The ultimatum was clear – delete the review, and only then would they consider transferring his money.
Saeed, resolute in his pursuit of justice, refused to succumb to the pressure. Despite threats and rude remarks, he stood firm, stating that he would not retract his review until his funds were rightfully returned.
The amount held hostage by Ivision Market amounted to approximately 6317 AED – funds that Saeed rightfully owned but could not withdraw.
The last time Saeed checked his account, he realized that all his funds had been wiped out.
This distressing account reflects the challenges faced by investors dealing with Ivision Market, raising concerns not only about financial transparency but also about the company's response to customer dissatisfaction. The lack of communication, failed withdrawals, and coercive tactics employed by Ivision Market have left Saeed in a state of uncertainty and financial distress.
It is also important to note that this is not the first time Ivision Market has employed such unjust tactics on its users.
If the trader had consulted WikiFX before engaging with Ivision Market, it might have prevented the distressing situation they now find themselves in.
In times of trading disputes, maintaining meticulous records of interactions is paramount. WikiFX's Exposure function can serve as a vital tool for investors facing challenges similar to Saeed's. If you find yourself in a comparable situation, reach out to WikiFX for guidance through the provided channels. The quest for accountability and fairness in online trading remains an ongoing battle, and investors are encouraged to share their experiences to foster a transparent and trustworthy trading environment.
The trader's harrowing experience with Ivision Market serves as a stark reminder of the hurdles that traders may face in the world of online trading. It is essential for traders to be equipped with the right resources and support, especially when confronted with unresolved withdrawal issues. So download your free WikiFX mobile application from Google Play or the App Store now!
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
A recent allegation against STP Trading has cast doubt on the firm's business practices, highlighting the potential risks faced by retail traders in an increasingly crowded and competitive market.
Cross-border payments are now faster, cheaper, and simpler! Explore fintech, blockchain, and smart solutions to overcome costs, delays, and global payment hurdles.
The UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has issued a public warning regarding a fraudulent entity impersonating Admiral Markets, a legitimate and authorised trading firm. The clone firm, operating under the name Admiral EU Brokers and the domain Admiraleubrokerz.com, has been falsely presenting itself as an FCA-authorised business.
A 57-year-old Malaysian man recently fell victim to a fraudulent foreign currency investment scheme, losing RM113,000 in the process. The case was reported to the Commercial Crime Investigation Division in Batu Pahat, which is now investigating the incident.