简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:In this article, WikiFX would like to alert our users about the online broker, Wisemarket, as it has come under scrutiny due to withdrawal issues faced by investors.
Investing in financial markets can present an enticing opportunity for wealth accumulation, yet it also carries inherent risks, especially when engaging with online brokers. Wisemarkets has come under scrutiny for withdrawal problems experienced by investors, as exemplified by the individual we'll feature in this article.
Established in 2022, Wisemarket is a forex and CFD broker registered in St. Vincent and the Grenadines, a jurisdiction known for its lenient regulations on forex trading. However, Wisemarket operates without a valid license, making it a cause for concern.
Therefore, Wisemarket has a low rating on WikiFX, with a score of 1.24 out of 10. This is due to several factors, including a lack of transparency about the company's ownership and financial status, and the invalid license claim.
In the midst of an initially promising journey into the world of trading, a user had eagerly chosen Wisemarkets as their trusted broker. Lured by the enticing 50% credit support margin offered after a substantial $1,000 deposit, they embarked on their trading adventure with optimism. The markets appeared to be in their favor, as they managed to amass a profit of $3,400.
Anticipation turned to disappointment as they sought to reap the rewards of their hard-earned gains. On July 21, 2023, they initiated a withdrawal request with the hope of realizing their financial dreams. The request made its way through Wisemarkets' system on July 27, 2023, but as time passed, the funds remained frustratingly elusive in their bank account. Days turned into weeks, and as of October 4, 2023, the funds were still mired in a seemingly endless state of pending status.
Growing increasingly helpless and disheartened, the user turned to Wisemarkets' support team for guidance and resolution. Their plea, however, was met with a response that had become all too familiar. Wisemarkets had provided them with a lengthy message, ostensibly aimed at reassuring the user that their request had indeed been approved within the system. This step was emphasized as the “completion of our internal process.”
Yet, amid these words of reassurance, the message carried an unsettling undertone. It conveyed a critical point: the subsequent stages of the transaction were now frustratingly dependent on the often-opaque and enigmatic banking system. Wisemarkets explained that the duration of the transaction was at the mercy of the banking transfer system specific to the user's locality and jurisdiction, a process over which they had no direct control.
As an international platform, Wisemarkets catered to a diverse clientele scattered across the globe. The message ominously pointed out that the efficiency of these various banking systems could vary significantly based on geographical location, rendering the user powerless in the face of the ominous bureaucracy.
The user was urged to continue waiting with what little patience they had left. Wisemarkets maintained their commitment to assisting clients, but the user's growing sense of hopelessness and helplessness was palpable. Like many others who navigate the complex world of international trading, they found themselves ensnared in a disheartening web of uncertainty, where the pace of financial transactions was influenced by inscrutable factors well beyond their control.
Upon further investigation, WikiFX found that this is not the first time that Wisemarkets receive complaints from clients withdrawal issues.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
An individual trader has come forward with allegations of an unfavourable experience while using the services of the broker TradeEU.global.
A 49-year-old e-hailing driver in Malaysia fell victim to a fraudulent investment scheme, losing RM218,000 in a matter of weeks. The scheme, which falsely promised returns of 3 to 5 per cent within just three days, left the individual financially devastated.
SFC freezes $91M in client accounts at IBHK, SBI, Monmonkey, and Soochow over suspected hacking and market manipulation during unauthorized online trades.
The Italian regulator, CONSOB has issued a warning against five websites offering unauthorized financial services. This regulatory action aims to protect the public from fraudulent activities.