简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:CappmoreFX, launched in 2022, has recently drawn attention due to a series of unresolved issues, prompting concerns over its credibility and commitment. This article delves into the intricacies surrounding CappmoreFX's delayed withdrawal processes and its ongoing platform migration.
In the intricate realm of online forex and CFD trading, the emergence of brokers demands careful scrutiny to ensure a secure trading environment. Among these, CappmoreFX, launched in 2022, has recently drawn attention due to a series of unresolved issues, prompting concerns over its credibility and commitment. This article delves into the intricacies surrounding CappmoreFX's delayed withdrawal processes and its ongoing platform migration.
Based in Kingstown, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, CappmoreFX positions itself as an online forex and CFD broker with a wide range of trading features. Yet, the absence of comprehensive contact information, beyond the reported headquarters, raises a flag of caution. Furthermore, the broker's lack of regulation by any significant financial authority casts shadows of doubt on its legitimacy and reliability. Complaints surrounding CappmoreFX, including allegations of delayed or denied withdrawals and even claims of being a scam, add layers of uncertainty to its reputation.
Recently, WikiFX received a complaint from an Indian trader about CappmoreFX, highlighting the urgency of addressing these concerns. The trader in question has been waiting for over two months for a withdrawal that remains unprocessed. While some may regard the withdrawal amount as trivial, it is crucial to recognize that traders have the right to access their funds promptly. Any forex broker failing to facilitate such basic transactions undermines the rights of their clients, warranting attention and action.
CappmoreFX's approach to this situation, however, falls short of expected responsiveness. Instead of engaging clients directly, the broker chose to communicate through a general email, citing ongoing updates and the need for new CRM registrations. Such an approach, while attempting to provide clarity, leaves traders yearning for more transparent communication regarding the status of their withdrawal requests.
The standard practice of platform transitions in the forex market often signifies a broker's commitment to enhancing services. However, CappmoreFX's handling of this transition and its associated timing raise concerns. The absence of proactive communication about potential disruptions stemming from platform migration has left traders feeling perturbed and disheartened.
Regrettably, even after adhering to the new registration process, the aforementioned client remains without his withdrawal, an unsettling testament to the severity of the situation.
In conclusion, while CappmoreFX attempts to attribute withdrawal delays to an ongoing platform migration, the lack of prompt and transparent communication leaves lingering doubts about the broker's intentions and capabilities. The forex community's pursuit of clarity underscores the significance of transparent communication to uphold the industry's integrity. Traders are reminded of the imperative to conduct thorough research and scrutiny when selecting a trading partner, particularly during uncertain times.
For traders grappling with unresolved disputes, it is advised to meticulously document interactions with the platform, gather evidence, and consider seeking assistance from relevant regulatory authorities and reputable financial organizations. In times of ambiguity, reaching out to WikiFX through the following mediums below can potentially facilitate a just resolution:
Alternatively, you can lodge an Exposure on the WikiFX mobile application, which can be downloaded for free on both Google Play and App Store. Follow the instructions below to lodge your complaint:
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
An individual trader has come forward with allegations of an unfavourable experience while using the services of the broker TradeEU.global.
A 49-year-old e-hailing driver in Malaysia fell victim to a fraudulent investment scheme, losing RM218,000 in a matter of weeks. The scheme, which falsely promised returns of 3 to 5 per cent within just three days, left the individual financially devastated.
SFC freezes $91M in client accounts at IBHK, SBI, Monmonkey, and Soochow over suspected hacking and market manipulation during unauthorized online trades.
The Italian regulator, CONSOB has issued a warning against five websites offering unauthorized financial services. This regulatory action aims to protect the public from fraudulent activities.